When Adoptions Fail: What You Should Know about “Rehoming”
Q: What is “rehoming?”
A: Rehoming
is the term currently being used to describe a privately arranged second
placement for an adopted child when the first adoptive placement fails. Such a
failure is called a “disruption.” Usually, it is the initial adoptive family
that arranges the “rehoming” of a child to another adoptive family.
Q: Why would a child be moved from an initial
adoptive home?
A: Sometimes,
children and their adoptive families do not bond effectively. In particular,
difficulties may arise when children are adopted from other countries, or when
children are older (school age) when placed. Or, an adoptive family may have
received inaccurate information about important facts about the adopted child,
such as age or health status. Also, many children have been victims of physical
or sexual abuse, which prevents them from bonding in their initial placement.
Adoption disruption rates may range from 9 to 25 percent.
Q: I read a newspaper article that criticized
rehoming. What, exactly, are the concerns?
A: Concerns
stem from the fact that these replacement efforts frequently bypass social work
safeguards such as home studies, child abuse clearances, criminal record checks
and Interstate Compact clearances that are designed to protect the child. Failure
to follow the safeguards may expose the child to possible abuse or neglect. In
addition, bypassing these safeguards when proceeding with a private rehoming
for an adopted child may well be a violation of the law. Therefore, a family trying
to place its adopted child with another family must find competent legal
representation and comply with child welfare laws. Such families face possible
financial and criminal liability if the process is not well managed.
It is also
unclear whether all of these secondary placement families are fully aware of
the child’s needs or have the resources appropriate for the child’s care and
nurturance. Sometimes, after the child has been moved to another home, no one takes
responsibility for providing oversight and for ensuring that the child is doing
well in the new home. A second adoption that is done properly would provide
such oversight. However, when “rehoming” is handled privately, there may be no
home study, so no assessor or social worker would be assigned to oversee the
adoption, as would happen in an agency adoption. So, it may be difficult to
find the right entity qualified to oversee the adoption and make sure the child
is making a successful transition. If the replacement effort is private, these
costs may be covered by the placing or receiving parents.
Q: My husband and I adopted a six-year-old boy
last year, but we didn’t realize how difficult it would be. Is there anything
we can do short of placing him with another family?
A: If you adopted the child from a domestic agency, that agency
may offer post-adoption services, including counseling, respite care and mental
health services. The local children’s services agency also may offer services
to avoid disruption, particularly if the child’s actions are a danger to
himself or others. You also may opt to privately place the child in a treatment
or educational facility while maintaining ties with him. Adoption subsidies are
sometimes available to assist with the cost of placement. National adoption
advocacy groups recommend that more and better post-adoptive services be put in
place to support families such as yours. Ohio law makes special provisions
as to child support for adoption children placed in out of the home care with
county agencies. Support may be waived if the court decides this is
appropriate.
If these options fail, and you decide
the child should be placed in another home, then you must be careful to do so in
a responsible and ethical manner with the standard social work safeguards.
Q: What are some of the reasons for adoption
failures?
A: Sometimes
the child’s needs are too overwhelming for the adoptive family to handle, or
the family’s expectations are unreasonable. Sometimes the family lacks appropriate
training and resources to support the adoption or the family does not receive
appropriate social work support.
Also, in the
last 20 years, there has been a concerted effort to place special needs
children in adoptive homes. While such adoptions can work very well, they
present additional challenges that many adoptive families cannot manage
successfully.
While
enforcement of current laws can curtail some unethical rehoming, such
enforcement may also adversely affect situations where rehoming is a good
option for a child, such as when a child is moved to a grandparent’s home.
This “Law You Can Use” consumer legal
information article was provided by the Ohio State Bar Association. It was
prepared by Columbus attorney Susan Garner Eisenman, chair of Ohio’s Adoption
Law Roundtable and fellow of the American Academy of Assisted Reproductive
Technology Attorneys and the American Academy of Adoption Attorneys. Articles
appearing in this column are intended to provide broad, general information
about the law. Before applying this information to a specific legal problem,
readers are urged to seek advice from an attorney.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home