Editorial “Native” Ads May Confuse Consumers
Q: What is native advertising?
A: It
is usually easy to identify advertising when you pick up a magazine or watch a
television program because the ads are clearly differentiated from the magazine
article or TV program. Native advertising is a form of paid media that may be
harder to identify as advertising because it “looks and feels” like editorial
content and is integrated with whatever a consumer may be reading or viewing.
Q: What’s the big deal?
A: The
issue is whether you, the consumer, realize the content is advertising. Most of us approach advertising expecting
that the advertiser isn’t objective and is trying to sell us something. But we
tend to approach editorial content from a different perspective, and may be
more likely to accept as “truth” advertising that is merged with content.
Blurring the lines between editorial content and advertising could lead to
confusion if not deception.
Q: Is native advertising regulated?
A: No,
in the sense that there are no regulations set out in the Code of Federal Regulations that expressly address this. But yes in
the sense that Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act gives the Federal
Trade Commission broad authority to prohibit “unfair or deceptive acts or
practices in or affecting commerce.” The
FTC has enforcement power if it deems a piece of native advertising “deceptive,”
even without clear cut guidelines. So, if the FTC finds a native ad to be
“deceptive,” it can file a court injunction and apply “corrective practices”
against the advertiser.
Q: I run a small business, and wonder if the FTC might find my native advertising
to be deceptive. How can I avoid an enforcement action by the FTC?
A: Be
as transparent and conspicuous as possible within the framework of the
editorial content you offer. For example, some websites feature a “blog roll”
with boxes running down the page showing a thumbnail photo and a snippet of the
blog post. If the blog roll contains posts that are purely editorial and others
that are native advertising, you should clearly identify the “native ad” posts.
Use some background shading along with some text to indicate that the “native
ad” content is paid advertising.
In addition, make sure your readers/viewers
know what they are getting. Just using the words “sponsored by” may not be
clear enough. For example, does “sponsored by” mean someone paid the website to
write the content or does it mean that the sponsor actually wrote the piece? If
the latter is true, you should consider providing additional text such as “sponsor-generated
content,” which may be a more accurate description.
Q: What should I keep in mind when developing native ads for my business?
A: Native
advertising potentially offers you two advantages. First, it is less disruptive than traditional
advertising. The advertising content flows more naturally with the editorial
content. Second, it allows you to present interesting, engaging content that
readers enjoy. You can easily make sure the reader knows that what you’re
providing is advertising by offering transparency and clear disclosure.
This “Law You Can Use” column was provided
by the Ohio State Bar Association. It was prepared by Cincinnati attorney John
C. Greiner, partner at Graydon Head & Ritchey LLP. Articles appearing in this column are intended
to provide broad, general information about the law. Before applying this
information to a specific legal problem, readers are urged to seek advice from
an attorney.
Labels: advertising, editorial content, Federal Trade Commission, Federal Trade Commission Act, native advertising
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home